TAGD Ventures · Brisbane
We find the process that takes the most time, build the automation inside your own cloud, and hand it over running, tested and secure. Your data stays where it already lives, and a person still approves anything that matters.
The work
Most teams have one or two processes that quietly take days each week. These are the ones we usually start with.
Read as they arrive, matched to the purchase order, coded, and the exceptions put in front of the right person.
Checked for completeness, sorted and routed, with the reason for each decision recorded.
First drafts assembled from your own systems and documents, ready for someone to review and sign.
Quantities and requirements pulled from drawings and documents into your own templates.
Summarised and filed against the right record, with the source kept alongside.
The re-keying from one system to another that nobody should be doing by hand.
Where the work needs judgement, a person still makes the call. The automation does the reading, sorting and drafting.
Services
We get into your systems, process and people to find the one workflow worth automating first, and give you a fixed price to build it.
A$2,500 to A$3,500 plus GST
We build that workflow inside your own cloud, using AI only where it does a job that ordinary automation cannot.
Fixed price, set in the audit
We keep it running, add the next workflow, and give you senior technology advice when you need it.
Monthly, agreed up front
Approach
Anyone can point an AI tool at a website and call it an audit. We read the code, the cloud configuration, the integrations and the data, and we sit with the people who do the work. That is how the build price can be fixed, and how the automation ends up somewhere your security team is comfortable with.
Recent work
We do not name clients. Most of this work was in secure or regulated environments.
A frontline workflow was taking about five hours per matter. The prototype prepared each step and an officer approved it.
Time per matter came down to about thirty minutes, with a record of what the system prepared and who approved it.
A contract renewal was stuck behind a security review, with cloud, identity and process grown up separately.
The review closed within the engagement, with evidence for every control the team had been asked about.
A twelve-month programme had slowed to a crawl because nobody agreed which records could be trusted.
Within four weeks the programme had a remediation path its own people believed in and could run.
Free tool
If your organisation uses software to make, or help make, decisions that significantly affect people, your privacy policy will need to say so. Our check takes about two minutes, and your answers stay in your browser.
A few lines is enough. We read every message and reply within one business day.
